People often hear the sufferings of the workers and laborers through various platforms of social media, news channels, newspapers, etc. These even have called up for movements of enlightenment and reforms in society. One such reform appeared as with the Federal Employers Liability Act, 1908 for workers and laborers.
Between 1889 and 1920, the utilization of railroad manifolds in the US. With this manifold, the railroad workers were prone to significant dangers. This embarked on the need for some law to appease the railroad workers considering the harm they were exposed to. This led to the enactment of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act in the year 1908.
Introduction to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act:
The Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) is a federal law in the United States that was adopted in 1908 to protect and pay compensation to railroad workers who were injured on the job if the worker could prove that the railroad was at least partially legally liable in causing the damage. It is based on the federal government’s power over interstate commerce, which is granted by the Constitution’s commerce clause. There was no recourse for wounded railroad workers before its founding.
Although the protection offered by FELA for railroad workers is similar to that provided by workers’ compensation insurance in other industries, FELA is a fault-based system, unlike workers’ compensation.
The Coverage of FELA
The FELA provides coverage for more than simply bodily damage experienced while working for the railroad. It also covers asbestos-related ailments, as well as repetitive stress and cumulative trauma injuries. Furthermore, FELA cases have played an important role in creating a precedent for numerous tort law issues, such as the possibility of emotional distress damages, damages apportionment, and standards for working conditions and employee safety.
FELA vs. Workers’ Compensation
To be eligible for FELA benefits, the injured railroad worker must demonstrate that the injury was caused in whole or in part by the carelessness of a railroad employee, its agent, or contractor, or by a faulty piece of equipment. However, if the worker is not determined to be entirely at fault, he can sue for damages in either state or federal court, which workers’ compensation claimants do not have.
Furthermore, FELA payments are typically substantially higher than workers’ compensation awards. The legal notion of comparative negligence is used by FELA. This means that the jury assesses the percentage of negligence for which each party is accountable, which determines the percentage of the award to be assigned to the worker is determined by the amount of negligence for which each party is liable.
Many workers in the United States are covered by a workers’ compensation insurance plan provided by their employer. It is a state-mandated insurance scheme, and each state has its own set of laws and systems for implementing it. Workers’ compensation legislation generally exempts the employer from any culpability (such as negligence) over the amount specified by the workers’ compensation legislative framework.
Since its inception, FELA has been the subject of thousands of interpretations by both federal and state appellate courts. Initially, railroad employers opposed the implementation of a workers’ compensation system for railroad employee injuries, although railroad unions supported this system. Their roles have since been reversed. Employers currently seek to replace FELA with workers’ compensation, but labor groups say that FELA should be preserved.
Image : https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2017/08/17/14/03/workers-2651431_960_720.jpg